Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz ; 99(4): 415-9, 2004 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15322632

RESUMO

This study compares smear, growth in Lowenstein-Jensen medium, and in-house polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. A total of 72 specimens from 72 patients with clinical symptoms of tuberculosis, including 70 sputum and two bronchial aspirate samples, were tested in parallel by smear, culture, and in-house PCR techniques. From these, 48 (66.6%) were negative by the 3 methods, 2 (2.8%) were smear positive and negative by culture and in-house PCR, 11 (15.3%) were both smear and culture negative, and in-house PCR positive, 7 (9.7%) were positive by the 3 methods, 2 (2.8%) were positive by smear and culture, and negative by PCR, 2 (2.8%) were positive by culture and PCR, but smear negative. After the resolution of discrepancies in PCR results, the sensitivity and specificity for in-house PCR technique to M. tuberculosis relative to the culture, were 81.8% and 81.9%, respectively. These results confirm that this method, in-house PCR, may be a sensitive and specific technique for M. tuberculosis detection, occurring in both positive and negative smear and negative cultures.


Assuntos
Mycobacterium tuberculosis/isolamento & purificação , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Tuberculose Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Líquido da Lavagem Broncoalveolar/microbiologia , Meios de Cultura , DNA Bacteriano/análise , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/normas , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Escarro/microbiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...